1967 Quarter Price: Values & Guide

The value of a 1967 United States quarter depends on its condition. Factors influencing the price include its mint mark (indicating the specific mint where it was produced), any imperfections such as scratches or damage, and the overall grade assigned by reputable coin grading services. A circulated quarter, commonly seen in everyday use, will have a significantly lower value than a well-preserved, uncirculated specimen.

The price of a 1967 quarter, especially in high condition, can be a reflection of the broader numismatic market trends. Demand from collectors and investors can drive up prices, while economic conditions can affect the relative scarcity and desirability of these coins. Understanding the coin's condition, mint mark, and historical context is critical to assessing its potential value. The collectible market for these coins fluctuates, so current price guides and expert appraisals are essential to determining precise worth.

This information provides the necessary background for an article focused on the numismatic market and the factors that influence values for United States quarters from 1967. The subsequent sections will delve deeper into specific aspects of collecting and investing in this era of American coinage.

1967 Quarter Price

Determining the price of a 1967 quarter hinges on several key factors. Understanding these aspects is crucial for accurate valuation and informed decision-making in the numismatic market.

• Coin condition
• Mint mark
• Circulation history
• Grading service
• Market demand
• Economic trends
• Rarity
• Investment intent

A coin's condition directly impacts its price. A well-preserved, uncirculated 1967 quarter commands a higher price than a circulated one. Mint mark, indicating the issuing mint, also influences value. A quarter's circulation history reveals its use and potential wear. The grading service's assessment, often via professional standards, standardizes valuation. Market demand for 1967 quarters, driven by collector interest and economic fluctuations, shapes the price. Economic trends affect overall pricing, influencing the desirability and rarity of various coins. Higher-grade, rare, or highly sought-after quarters increase in value. Lastly, the investor's intent, whether for appreciation or short-term gain, shapes the specific market environment for such a coin.

1. Coin condition

Coin condition is a paramount factor in determining the price of a 1967 quarter. The degree of preservation directly correlates with the value realized in the market. This aspect necessitates careful consideration of various factors influencing a coin's condition.

• Grade and Certification
  

  A professionally assigned grade, typically based on established standards like those of Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) or Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), plays a crucial role in establishing a coin's value. A higher grade signifies superior preservation, showcasing minimal wear, and absence of damage, resulting in a higher price. The grading service's certification serves as a tangible validation of the coin's condition, enhancing its credibility and market appeal.

• Circulation History
  

  A coin's history of circulation significantly impacts its condition. A coin circulated extensively will exhibit visible wear, including scratches, nicks, and potentially significant discoloration. Such a history translates to a lower grade and correspondingly lower market price. Conversely, a coin that has remained uncirculated or lightly circulated will maintain a higher grade and value.

• Physical Imperfections
  

  Imperfections like dents, scratches, or significant discoloration directly affect a coin's grade and price. Dents and major scratches indicate a less desirable condition. The extent of these imperfections, along with their locations, determine the coin's overall grade and ultimately its market price. Collectors often prioritize coins with minimal physical flaws.

• Restoration and Alteration
  

  Any signs of restoration or alteration are critical to a coin's evaluation. Restoration can compromise a coin's authenticity and negatively impact its grade. A coin altered to enhance its appearance receives a lower grade and consequently sells for a lower price. Collectors prioritize originality and seek out coins in their unaltered, natural state.

In summary, the condition of a 1967 quarter fundamentally shapes its price. Careful assessment of factors like the assigned grade, circulation history, physical imperfections, and any restoration is essential to accurately value such a coin in the numismatic market. Understanding these nuances provides collectors and investors with a more informed perspective.

2. Mint mark

The mint mark on a 1967 quarter, a crucial identifier, significantly influences its price. This distinctive mark, often a letter or numeral, signifies the specific United States Mint facility where the coin was produced. Variations in minting processes, quality control, and even the relative demand for particular mint products impact the collectible market, influencing the price of a 1967 quarter accordingly.

• Identifying the Mint of Origin
  

  The mint mark serves as a key identifier for determining the exact location where a 1967 quarter was minted. Knowing the mint of origin helps collectors and investors appreciate the coin's specific characteristics and production history. This information is fundamental in understanding potential variations in the coin's design, metal composition, or overall quality. Different mints may have slightly different standards, influencing the eventual appearance and price of the coin.

• Rarity and Value Variations
  

  Certain mint marks can correlate with variations in the relative rarity of a particular 1967 quarter. This correlation is not absolute, but a historical pattern of production volumes and reported quality differences between mints may exist. Such distinctions can lead to price fluctuations, impacting the value of a 1967 quarter bearing a particular mint mark, often reflecting broader demand in the numismatic market. Understanding the specific mint mark's production characteristics and relative scarcity allows accurate appraisal.

• Collecting and Investment Strategies
  

  Collectors often seek out particular mint marks to complete sets or build specialized collections. The identification of a specific mint mark, therefore, enables collectors to target coins with specific origins, potentially impacting the price of a given 1967 quarter. Investors, similarly, might focus on mint marks showing high-quality production runs, potentially increasing the price of particular coins.

• Market Demand and Price Fluctuations
  

  Demand for specific mint marks can fluctuate over time, influencing their overall price. Factors such as the relative popularity of particular mints, the scarcity of certain mint marks, or market trends contribute to these variations. An understanding of these dynamics is essential in accurately assessing the price of a 1967 quarter bearing a given mint mark, as fluctuations in demand for that mark will often determine its final price.

In conclusion, the mint mark on a 1967 quarter, a crucial piece of identifying information, significantly influences the price. A comprehensive understanding of the mint mark's role in rarity, value variations, collecting strategies, and market fluctuations is imperative for accurate valuation in the numismatic market. Different mint marks can create significant price disparities, making it a key aspect to consider when evaluating a 1967 quarter's worth.

3. Circulation History

A coin's circulation history profoundly impacts its price. For a 1967 quarter, the degree to which it has been used in circulation directly correlates with its condition and, consequently, its market value. This aspect is crucial for collectors and investors to understand when evaluating these coins.

• Extent of Handling and Wear
  

  A quarter subjected to extensive circulation will exhibit noticeable wear. This wear, encompassing scratches, nicks, and potentially even significant discoloration, directly reflects the coin's usage. Heavily circulated coins typically receive lower grades from professional grading services, leading to a lower price point. Conversely, a coin with minimal signs of wear, indicating limited circulation, typically receives a higher grade, commanding a higher price.

• Impact of Grading and Certification
  

  Professional grading services assess a coin's condition, considering its circulation history. The grade assigned directly correlates with the level of wear observed. A higher grade signifies less wear, implying limited circulation, thus increasing the coin's market value. Certification by reputable grading services enhances the coin's credibility and reliability for buyers and sellers. A circulated coin without certification will usually command a lower price than a certified, less circulated coin.

• Rarity and Demand Considerations
  

  While not strictly a part of the circulation history, uncirculated coins, often found in mint sets, are a significant consideration and a point of comparison. The existence of uncirculated specimens affects how circulated coins are valued. Collectors may prefer the original condition of a coin, and the scarcity of uncirculated specimens drives demand, potentially influencing the perceived worth of a circulated example.

• Rarity and Investment Decisions
  

  The relatively high production numbers of 1967 quarters mean that circulated coins, even in high condition, do not typically hold the same value as extremely rare or scarce coins. Collectors often prioritize coins in original condition. The circulation history provides insight into how many of these coins entered everyday use. Understanding the interplay between circulation history and relative scarcity is essential to navigating investment decisions in this market.

In summary, understanding a 1967 quarter's circulation history is vital for accurate valuation. The extent of handling and wear, as evaluated by grading services, directly influences the coin's condition and market price. Collectors and investors must consider how the coin's circulation history interacts with its overall condition and its place in the broader market. A coin's circulation history is a crucial factor alongside mint mark and grade in determining its appropriate market value.

4. Grading service

Grading services play a critical role in determining the price of a 1967 quarter. These services, exemplified by organizations like Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) and Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC), provide standardized assessments of a coin's condition. The grade assigned by these services directly impacts a coin's value. A higher grade, indicating superior preservation, correlates with a higher price. Conversely, a lower grade, reflecting significant wear or damage, results in a lower price.

The importance of a grading service stems from its ability to objectively evaluate a coin's condition. Subjectivity in assessing a coin's condition can lead to discrepancies in pricing. A standardized grading system, based on established criteria and meticulous review by trained professionals, ensures consistent valuation across various marketplaces. This objectivity empowers both buyers and sellers to confidently navigate transactions, reducing the risk of mispricing. For instance, a PCGS "Mint State 65" (MS65) graded 1967 quarter will typically command a higher price than an NGC "Good-Very Good" (G-VG) graded one due to the former's superior condition. The grading service acts as an independent verifier, confirming the condition and enhancing the coin's credibility in the market.

Understanding the role of grading services is crucial for anyone involved in collecting, buying, or selling 1967 quarters. Accurate valuation hinges on the objectivity and consistency provided by these services. Collectors and investors benefit from standardized assessments that reflect a coin's true condition. This understanding helps avoid inflated or undervalued prices, ensuring informed decisions in the numismatic market. Furthermore, the consistency provided by grading services enables comparisons of similar coins, promoting a more reliable and transparent market for these items.

5. Market demand

Market demand significantly impacts the price of a 1967 quarter. Fluctuations in collector interest, investor activity, and overall economic conditions all contribute to price variations. Understanding these dynamics is essential for accurately assessing the value of these coins.

• Collector Interest and Trends
  

  Collector interest in specific numismatic eras and types of coins can drive up demand. Interest in the 1960s, or particular features of 1967 quarters, can elevate prices. Emerging collecting trends, such as a renewed interest in specific mint marks or conditions, directly influence the demand for and thus the market value of a 1967 quarter. Historical events or pop culture references associated with the era can also shape collector preferences.

• Investment Activity and Speculation
  

  Investor activity plays a substantial role. Investment in numismatics, driven by perceived appreciation potential or short-term speculation, can create price surges. Market sentiment, fueled by macroeconomic factors, influences investor confidence and subsequent purchasing decisions. This influence manifests in price adjustments, reflecting the perceived value of the coin as an investment vehicle. News regarding economic forecasts or other similar developments can affect the pricing.

• Economic Conditions and Currency Value
  

  Broad economic conditions affect the perceived value of investment assets, including numismatic items. Periods of inflation or economic uncertainty often see investors seek out tangible assets, like coins. This increased demand, coupled with the reduced purchasing power of currency, can drive up prices. Conversely, periods of economic stability may lessen the appeal of numismatic investments. Such fluctuations in the overall economic climate are reflected in the price of 1967 quarters.

• Supply and Availability
  

  The availability of coins in the market influences demand. Scarcity, whether due to limited minting or damage, generally increases demand and pushes up prices. Conversely, high production volumes for a particular coin type may lower prices. The relative supply of 1967 quarters in various conditions affects market pricing in response to shifts in demand.

Understanding market demand is crucial when assessing the price of a 1967 quarter. Collector trends, investor behavior, economic conditions, and supply dynamics all interact to shape the price. Appraisals must consider the interplay of these factors to provide an accurate evaluation. A nuanced understanding of market forces is crucial for informed decisions in numismatic transactions.

6. Economic Trends

Economic trends exert a significant influence on the price of a 1967 quarter. Factors such as inflation, economic stability, and investment sentiment all play a role in shaping market value. Understanding these economic forces is crucial for accurately assessing the worth of these coins. This analysis explores the key connections between broader economic trends and the specific valuation of 1967 quarters.

• Inflation and Purchasing Power
  

  Inflation erodes the purchasing power of currency over time. When inflation rises, the perceived value of physical assets, such as collectible coins, often increases. This is because collectors and investors may view these assets as a hedge against devaluation. The relative stability of 1967 quarter values in periods of higher inflation may make them attractive investments. Conversely, in periods of low inflation or deflation, the perceived investment value of coins may decrease, potentially affecting their price.

• Economic Stability and Investment Confidence
  

  Periods of economic stability often encourage investment in tangible assets. Collectors and investors may perceive coins as a safe haven during times of economic uncertainty. Conversely, during periods of economic instability or recession, investors may be more cautious, potentially shifting their investment focus to other asset classes. This shift can impact the demand for and thus the price of 1967 quarters. Stable economic conditions tend to support a steady, or at least more predictable, market for numismatic items.

• Investment Sentiment and Market Trends
  

  Broader investment sentiment can significantly impact the market for numismatic items. When there is a surge in interest in collectible items or a general trend toward alternative investments, the price of 1967 quarters may increase. Conversely, a downturn in investment sentiment or a shift towards other asset classes can depress prices. Market trends and investor behaviors are crucial elements to consider in assessing the current and future value of a 1967 quarter.

• Interest Rates and Return on Investment
  

  Interest rates directly influence the returns on alternative investments. When interest rates are high, investment in fixed income assets becomes more attractive. This can cause a shift in investment strategies, potentially reducing demand for collectible coins like 1967 quarters. Conversely, low interest rates may increase the appeal of coins as a potentially higher-return asset class. Monitoring interest rates and their effect on overall investment strategies is vital when examining the pricing trends for these coins.

In conclusion, economic trends are integral to understanding the pricing dynamics of 1967 quarters. Inflation, economic stability, investment sentiment, and interest rates all contribute to market fluctuations. Recognizing these influences allows for a more informed appraisal of these coins, considering their potential value both as collectables and investments.

7. Rarity

Rarity, a crucial factor in numismatics, significantly impacts the price of a 1967 quarter. The relative scarcity of a coin, influenced by factors like mint production, condition, and desired characteristics, directly correlates with its market value. A rarer coin, often possessing desirable features, typically commands a premium compared to a more common one.

• Mint Production and Errors
  

  Variations in mint production methods, including errors in minting, can affect a coin's rarity. Errors, such as misaligned designs, extra letters, or incorrect metal compositions, often lead to higher values due to their reduced number. A 1967 quarter exhibiting such an error, if in desirable condition, typically has a substantially elevated price point compared to a standard, error-free specimen. The rarity associated with these errors directly drives up the market demand, thereby affecting the coin's price.

• Condition and Preservation
  

  High-grade, uncirculated 1967 quarters are typically rarer than heavily circulated ones. The level of preservation directly influences a coin's scarcity. Well-preserved, uncirculated examples from mint sets are exceptionally rare, commanding significantly higher prices. The rarity associated with pristine condition, resulting from a limited exposure to circulation, is a key driver in the price appreciation for these items.

• Specific Mint Marks
  

  Certain mint marks on 1967 quarters can influence their rarity. While the overall production of 1967 quarters is not exceptionally low, specific mint marks, if associated with particular production characteristics, can exhibit some variability in scarcity and demand. The rarity linked to these specific mint marks creates variations in the price ranges for similar coins.

• Collectors' Interest and Demand
  

  Collectors' focus on specific features, like certain mint marks, or particular production runs, also contributes to rarity. The perceived desirability of a specific 1967 quarter can increase its perceived rarity and drive demand, consequently affecting its price. The intensity of collectors' interest for certain 1967 quarters fuels the market value, leading to a greater financial worth for them.

Ultimately, rarity, influenced by factors ranging from production errors to collectors' preferences, plays a pivotal role in shaping the price of a 1967 quarter. Understanding the interrelation between rarity, condition, and market demand is vital for accurate valuation in the numismatic world.

8. Investment intent

Investment intent significantly influences the price of a 1967 quarter. The motivations behind acquiring a coinwhether for appreciation, speculation, or a combinationdirectly shape market forces. A collector seeking a specific 1967 quarter for a complete set will likely pay a different price than an investor focused on short-term gains. This difference is due to the varying levels of demand and supply influenced by diverse investment intentions.

The intent behind an investment significantly impacts the value a collector assigns to a particular 1967 quarter. An investor primarily interested in rapid appreciation might pay a premium for a coin projected to increase in value quickly, while a collector focused on a complete set might prioritize a coin fitting within a specific condition range. This difference in approach to value directly affects the transaction price. Real-world examples include a collector seeking a specific mint mark in high condition, driving demand and thus price for those particular coins, whereas an investor focused on quick profit may consider only coins projected to see rapid price increases. The interplay of these intents creates dynamic price fluctuations within the numismatic market.

Understanding the investment intent of a buyer and seller is crucial for accurate valuation. A collector seeking a 1967 quarter for a specific collection may place less emphasis on short-term price appreciation compared to an investor. This nuanced understanding of investment intent allows for a more accurate valuation and facilitates informed decision-making within the coin market. It highlights the importance of considering the broader context beyond simple grading and condition when assessing a coin's value. In practice, a knowledgeable buyer or seller will consider the different intents of each transaction and adjust their evaluation and pricing strategies accordingly. Ultimately, recognizing diverse investment intentions reveals how market dynamics, fueled by individual motivations, determine the fluctuating price of a 1967 quarter.

Frequently Asked Questions about 1967 Quarter Value

This section addresses common inquiries regarding the pricing of 1967 United States quarters. Accurate valuation depends on various factors, and these FAQs aim to clarify common misconceptions and provide helpful insights.

Question 1: How does a 1967 quarter's condition affect its price?

A 1967 quarter's condition, assessed by professional grading services, is a primary determinant of its price. Coins in pristine, uncirculated condition, exhibiting minimal wear, command significantly higher prices than those showing extensive wear and tear. Factors like scratches, dents, and discoloration directly impact the assigned grade and, consequently, the market value.

Question 2: What is the role of mint marks in determining a 1967 quarter's value?

Mint marks, indicating the specific mint where a coin was produced, can influence a 1967 quarter's price. While variations in rarity between different mint marks are not always pronounced for 1967 quarters, historical data regarding production and perceived quality differences can affect value. Collectors seeking specific mint marks for complete sets or for perceived quality variations may drive up prices for those with specific mint marks.

Question 3: How does the circulation history impact a 1967 quarter's price?

A 1967 quarter's circulation history significantly affects its condition and, thus, its price. Coins that have circulated extensively exhibit greater wear, resulting in lower grades and consequently lower values. Conversely, coins with minimal circulation, often in mint sets, maintain higher grades and prices. The historical use of the coin is crucial to evaluating its worth.

Question 4: What role do professional grading services play in valuing 1967 quarters?

Professional grading services provide standardized assessments of a 1967 quarter's condition. These assessments, based on established criteria, ensure consistent evaluation and reduce subjectivity in pricing. A higher grade, indicative of better preservation, usually correlates with a higher market price.

Question 5: How do market trends affect the price of a 1967 quarter?

Market trends, driven by collector interest, investor activity, and economic conditions, influence 1967 quarter prices. Increased collector interest, investment speculation, or economic factors like inflation can drive up prices. Conversely, periods of economic stability or reduced investor interest may result in lower values.

Question 6: Why does the rarity of a 1967 quarter affect its price?

The rarity of a 1967 quarter plays a significant role in its pricing. Coins that are less common due to factors like limited mintage or minting errors generally command higher prices. Collectors' interest in particular features, such as specific mint marks, further contributes to the perceived rarity and the resulting value. The relative scarcity of a coin type affects its market value.

Understanding these factors provides a framework for appreciating the nuances involved in evaluating 1967 quarter values. Consult with coin experts or reputable online resources for specific valuations.

The subsequent sections will delve deeper into specialized aspects of coin collecting and investing.

Tips for Determining 1967 Quarter Prices

Accurate assessment of a 1967 quarter's value hinges on a comprehensive understanding of various factors. These tips provide a structured approach to evaluating these coins and making informed decisions.

Tip 1: Assess Coin Condition Thoroughly. A 1967 quarter's condition directly influences its price. Professional coin grading services, like PCGS or NGC, employ standardized criteria to evaluate wear, damage, and preservation. A higher grade signifies better preservation, typically commanding a higher price. Assess the coin for scratches, dents, and discoloration. A coin's circulation history, evident in these imperfections, is a crucial aspect of valuation.

Tip 2: Identify the Mint Mark. The mint mark, a letter or numeral, indicates the mint of origin. Variations in production processes and quality control between mints may lead to differing values. Research the specific mint mark and its significance in the context of 1967 quarter production. Knowing the mint of origin helps in accurately evaluating the coin's potential value.

Tip 3: Understand Circulation History. A coin's circulation history directly impacts its condition. Heavily circulated coins often display visible wear, reducing their value. Lightly circulated or uncirculated coins, found in mint sets or rarely used, typically maintain higher values. Evaluate the coin's appearance for indications of handling and wear, referencing professional grading standards.

Tip 4: Utilize Reliable Grading Services. Expert grading services are essential for a fair evaluation. These services offer standardized assessments, reducing subjectivity. A reputable grading service, such as PCGS or NGC, provides a consistent benchmark for condition assessment, influencing the perceived value. A certified grade provides a valuable benchmark for pricing and trading decisions.

Tip 5: Analyze Current Market Demand. Market demand for 1967 quarters fluctuates. Collector interest, investment trends, and economic conditions influence pricing. Research current market trends and consider the relative scarcity and desirability of the specific coin in question. Understanding market factors is crucial for informed valuation.

Tip 6: Research Similar Coins. Compare the coin under evaluation to similar 1967 quarters of comparable condition and mint marks. Study sales records, auction results, and online pricing guides. This comparative analysis provides a broader perspective on the coin's market position and potential value. Comparing multiple examples offers a context for evaluation.

Tip 7: Consult Coin Experts. Professional numismatists or coin dealers can provide valuable insights into a 1967 quarter's value. Experienced professionals can offer guidance on determining the grade, identifying errors, and evaluating the coin's overall condition and rarity. Expert consultation adds significant value in accurate valuation.

Implementing these tips will aid in a comprehensive evaluation of a 1967 quarter's value. Accurate valuation relies on careful consideration of the coin's condition, mint mark, circulation history, market trends, and comparable sales data. A well-rounded approach enhances the understanding of these valuable collectibles.

By understanding these essential aspects, collectors and investors can make informed decisions regarding their 1967 quarter holdings. This informed evaluation process is crucial to appreciating the true value of these coins in a diverse market.

Conclusion

The value of a 1967 quarter is a multifaceted consideration. Factors such as condition, assessed through professional grading services, mint mark, circulation history, and current market demand all play crucial roles in establishing a coin's worth. Rarity, particularly in relation to mint errors or high preservation, significantly impacts value. Economic trends also contribute, as fluctuating inflation and investment sentiment influence the perceived desirability of collectible coins. The interplay of these elements forms the complex landscape impacting the 1967 quarter price.

Accurate valuation necessitates careful consideration of all pertinent factors. Collectors and investors should consult reputable resources, including professional coin graders and online price guides, for detailed assessments. Understanding the interplay of condition, rarity, and market trends is crucial for informed decision-making. While no single formula exists for precise valuation, a comprehensive approach based on factual data and expert insights empowers collectors and investors to navigate the complexities of the numismatic market, ensuring sound financial judgments regarding 1967 quarters. Continued market analysis and professional consultation are vital for sustained understanding within this dynamic field.